CiviLab 2027 · Quality · Version 7.1

CiviLab 7.1 validation

All tests and calculations of CiviLab 7.1 have been compared with published examples, values of the standards, analytical solutions or calculations redone by hand. This page gives all the results, figure by figure.

36validation checks covering all tests and calculations
9category A: published examples
5category B: standard or analytical solution
22category C: independent calculation
26 / 26calculations redone by hand, all in agreement
7published slope stability cases

Approach

Every test and calculation of CiviLab 7.1 has been checked: the data are entered in CiviLab and the result is compared with an independently obtained value. Three categories of check:

  • A published example: data and result taken from a publication (FHWA manuals, British Geological Survey, ACI, university manuals, ACADS and GeoStudio cases…);
  • B standard or analytical solution: values tabulated by the standard or exact solution;
  • C independent calculation: no published example found; the result is recalculated by hand, step by step, from the formulas of the standard.

The checks are completed by recalculations in Excel (validation workbook) and by the automated tests of the code (xUnit), run at every change.

Slope stability: published cases

Data of the publication entered in CiviLab, automatic search of the critical surface, factor of safety compared with the reference value and with the GeoStudio SLOPE/W results published in its verification manual. Difference = (CiviLab − GeoStudio) / GeoStudio, same method.

CaseMethodPublished referenceGeoStudioCiviLab 7.1Difference / GeoStudio
ACADS 1(a) — simple homogeneous slopeBishop1.000.9930.985−0.8 %
ACADS 1(a) — simple homogeneous slopeSpencer1.00–0.984–
ACADS 1(a) — simple homogeneous slopeMorgenstern-Price1.000.9930.985−0.8 %
ACADS — non-homogeneous slope (3 layers)Bishop1.391.4131.393−1.4 %
ACADS — non-homogeneous slope (3 layers)Spencer1.39–1.365–
ACADS — non-homogeneous slope (3 layers)Morgenstern-Price1.391.3821.365−1.2 %
ACADS — non-homogeneous slope, seismic kh = 0.15Bishop1.001.0161.011−0.5 %
ACADS — non-homogeneous slope, seismic kh = 0.15Spencer1.00–0.984–
ACADS — non-homogeneous slope, seismic kh = 0.15Morgenstern-Price1.000.9890.983−0.6 %
Arai and Tagyo (1985) — homogeneous slopeBishop1.4511.4171.404−0.9 %
Arai and Tagyo (1985) — homogeneous slopeSpencer1.451–1.401–
Arai and Tagyo (1985) — homogeneous slopeMorgenstern-Price1.4511.4141.400−1.0 %
Greco (1996), example 4 — multilayer slopeBishop1.40 to 1.421.4051.440+2.5 %
Greco (1996), example 4 — multilayer slopeSpencer1.40 to 1.42–1.421–
Greco (1996), example 4 — multilayer slopeMorgenstern-Price1.40 to 1.421.3891.414+1.8 %
ACADS — weak layer, specified surfaceSpencer1.34–1.276–
ACADS — weak layer, specified surfaceMorgenstern-Price1.341.2611.260−0.1 %
ACADS — weak layer, three-block searchSpencer1.26–1.253–
ACADS — weak layer, three-block searchMorgenstern-Price1.261.2611.243−1.4 %

CiviLab's searches generally find an F 0.5 to 1.5 % lower than GeoStudio, i.e. a more unfavourable surface. On the specified surface, where the surface is the same in both programs, the difference is 0.001. Exception: Greco, where Bishop gives 1.440 against 1.405; the search was checked with finer grids (1.440 to 1.443); Spencer (1.421) and Morgenstern-Price (1.414) lie within the range published by Greco (1.40 to 1.42). On the weak-layer slope, circles give 1.506: only the "three-block" search finds the mechanism (1.243).

Slope stability: analytical solutions, seismic coefficients and Excel recalculation

CheckExpectedCiviLab 7.1
Exact equilibrium φ = 0 (200 slices): Bishop; Spencer; Morgenstern-Price1.392641.39259; 1.39258; 1.39258 (−0.004 %)
Infinite slope, static (L = 496 m)1.40041.4012 (+0.06 %)
Infinite slope, kh = 0.10 (L = 496 m)1.10871.1093 (+0.05 %)
RPA 2024, zone III, group 2, site S3: kh; kv0.0775; 0.02583identical
RPA 2024, zone V, group 1B, site S2, ST = 1.2: kh; kv0.1440; 0.0720identical
RPA 2024 §10.3.6: required F in seismic situation1.151.15
NF P 94-270 I.4, ag/g = 0.2, S = 1.2: kh; kv (avg/ag = 0.9 then 0.5)0.12; 0.06; 0.0396identical
Excel recalculation, ACADS 1(a), Bishop: F; Fd0.98508; 0.788060.98508; 0.78806
Excel recalculation, ACADS 1(a), kh = 0.15: Fellenius; Bishop0.68711; 0.715860.68711; 0.71586
Excel recalculation, ACADS 1(a): Morgenstern-Price (λ); Spencer with kh = 0.150.98410 (0.529); 0.717110.98410 (0.529); 0.71711
Excel recalculation, ACADS §2.8 specified surface: Morgenstern-Price; Spencer1.26033; 1.276021.26033; 1.27602

All tests and calculations

Test / calculationSourceExpectedCiviLab 7.1
Slope stability
ABishop, Spencer, Morgenstern-Price, seismic, non-circular surfaces7 published cases: ACADS (Giam and Donald 1989) §2.1, 2.3, 2.4, 2.7, 2.8; Arai and Tagyo (1985); Greco (1996), compared with the references and with GeoStudiosee table abovedifferences 0.1 to 1.8 % (Greco Bishop +2.5 %)
BExact equilibrium φ = 0; infinite slope, static and seismicAnalytical solutions1.39264; 1.4004; 1.10871.39258; 1.4012; 1.1093
BSeismic coefficientsRPA 2024 §10.3 (10.22, 10.23); NF P 94-270 annex I.40.100 / 0.050; 0.120 / 0.060identical
Triaxial (NF EN ISO 17892-8/9, NF P 94-070)
ACIU — c′, φ′British Geological Survey, report IR/06/065: 4 published testsφ′ 24.45 / 26.7 / 17.56 / 26.44°; c′ 28.78 / 0.36 / 7.4 / 3.76 kPaidentical within 0.01° and 0.01 kPa
ACD — failure, c′, φ′University of Waterloo, CIV E 353 (2006), Winnipeg clay: raw readings of 4 specimens; independent calculation (Python, Excel)φ′ 17.97°; c′ 26.14 kPa17.97°; 26.14 kPa
BUU — equations (1) to (6)NF EN ISO 17892-8: hand calculation of the corrections (piston, membrane, area)hand calculationidentical
Laboratory — soils
AParticle size — percent passingKennesaw State University, Geotechnical Engineering Lab Manual (2025), Lab 3, table 3-2 (7 sieves, 304.4 g)95.99; 86.63; 57.65; 23.98; 6.01; 0.39 %identical (to 0.01)
AAtterberg limits — wP, wL (Casagrande)Same manual, Lab 5, table 5-1wP 28 %; wL ≈ 40 %wP 27.99 %; wL 39.55 %
CLimits — 80 g / 30° coneNF P 94-052-1: w at 17 mm44.6 %44.6 %
CProctor — wOPT, ρd maxNF P 94-093: optimum by 2nd-degree polynomial12.78 %; 1.879identical
CCBRNF P 94-078: max(F2.5/13.35; F5/19.93)22.222.2
CHydrometer — Stokes diameterNF P 94-0570.0751 mmidentical
CDirect shear — c′, φ′NF EN ISO 17892-10: regression of failure τ16.6 kPa; 29.9°identical
COedometer — CcNF EN ISO 17892-50.172identical
CLos Angeles, Micro-Deval, sand equivalentNF EN 1097-2, 1097-1, 933-822.6; 13.8; 77.0identical
CParticle size — FM, Cu, CcNF EN 12620 annex B; definitions of Cu and Cc2.68; 5.26; 0.84identical
In-situ tests
CMénard pressuremeter — pl (inverse curve, hyperbola)NF P 94-110-1 annex D2.006 MPa2.006 MPa
CMénard pressuremeter — EMNF P 94-110-1 § D.2.28.80 MPaidentical
CDynamic penetrometer — qdNF EN ISO 22476-2, Dutch formula3.39 MPaidentical
CCPT — qc, fsNF P 94-113 / NF EN ISO 22476-1: Qc = 2.1 kN, Ac = 10 cm²; Qs = 0.75 kN, As = 150 cm²2.100 MPa; 50.000 kPa2.100 MPa; 50.000 kPa
Foundations (bearing capacity)
Ac-φ strip footing — c·Nc and q·Nq termsFHWA NHI-06-089 (2006), example 8-1: B = 6 ft, D = 5 ft, c = 500 psf, φ = 20°, γ = 125 pcf7 400 psf; 4 000 psf; qult 13 425 psf (Nγ Vesic 5.4)7 400; 4 000 psf; qu 12 712 psf with Nγ DTU 13.12 = 3.5 (difference due only to the code Nγ)
BFactors Nc, Nq, NγEN 1997-1 annex D; DTU 13.12 § 3.2.1 (table)18.40 / 20.09 (φ = 30°); 5.14 (φ = 0); DTU 30 / 18.4 / 18.1identical
BShape and inclination factorsDTU 13.12 § 3.2.1 (B/L = 0.75; δ = 10°)1.15 / 0.85 / 0.790 / 0.444identical
Cqu laboratory, pressuremeter, CPT (DTU 13.12)DTU 13.12 § 3.2.1, 3.2.2, 3.2.3.1626.6; 928.3; 670.6 kPaidentical
CSPT — Meyerhof (1956)q = 12·N·Kd (B ≤ 1.2 m), published SI form239.1 kPaidentical
Settlement
AOedometric — wide embankmentFHWA NHI-06-088 (2006), example 7-3: NC clay 10 ft, Cc 0.5, e0 1.0, p0 600 psf, Δp 2 400 psf1.75 ft (0.53 m)1.747 ft (0.5326 m)
AOedometric — under a footingFHWA NHI-06-089 (2006), example 8-3: NC clay 10 ft, Cc 0.4, e0 0.75, p0 2 145 psf, Δp 208 psf0.09 ft = 1.1 in0.0919 ft = 1.10 in
CMénard pressuremeter — sc, sdNF P 94-261 annex H0.40; 0.85 cm0.40; 0.85 cm
CElastic; modulus of subgrade reactions = cf·(1 − ν²)·q·B/E; 1/kv (Ménard)1.28 cmidentical
Concrete
AACI mix designACI 211.1-91, appendix 1, example 1water 181; cement 289.1; coarse aggregate 1 136; sand 774.4 kg/m³; water to add 123181; 289.1; 1 136; 774.4; 122.9
CRebound hammerNF EN 12504-2 § 8 (median); ASTM C805 § 9.132; 31.33identical
CCompression; ultrasonic pulse velocityNF EN 12390-3; NF EN 12504-426.2 MPa; 4 161 m/sidentical
CSonRebPublished correlations (Meynink et al. 1979…)34.5 MPaidentical
CDreux-Gorisse, Bolomey, FauryPublished methods (Dreux and Festa; Bolomey 1925; Faury 1941)YA 46.13 %; P(0.08) 15.1 %; 60.87 %identical
Roads and asphalt
CBulk density (paraffin-coated)NF EN 12697-6 method D2.341 g/cm³2.341
CKumagawa; degree of compactionBinder content; C = 100·γ/γmax5.63 %; 96.6 %identical

Hand verification (category C)

The 26 category C calculations were redone by hand, step by step, from the formulas of the standard, and compared with the CiviLab result: all agree.

No.FamilyCalculationStandard / formulaHand calculationCiviLab 7.1
1LaboratoryProctor — wOPT and ρd maxNF P 94-093wOPT 12.78 % ; ρd max 1.879 g/cm³12.78 % ; 1.879 g/cm³
2LaboratoryAtterberg limits — Casagrande and coneNF P 94-051wL 45.73 % ; IP 23.33 ; wL cone 44.59 %45.7 % ; 23.3 ; 44.6 %
3LaboratoryCBRNF P 94-07822.222.2
4LaboratoryHydrometer — Stokes diameterNF P 94-0570.0751 mm0.0751 mm
5LaboratoryDirect shear — c′, φ′NF EN ISO 17892-10c' 16.6 kPa ; φ' 29.9°16.6 kPa ; 29.9°
6LaboratoryOedometer — CcNF EN ISO 17892-50.1720.172
7LaboratoryLos Angeles, Micro-Deval, sand equivalentNF EN 1097-222.6 ; 13.8 ; 77.022.6 ; 13.8 ; 77.0
8LaboratoryParticle size — FM, Cu, CcNF EN 12620 annex B2.68 ; 5.26 ; 0.842.68 ; 5.26 ; 0.84
9In situDynamic penetrometer — qdNF EN ISO 22476-2, formule des Hollandais3.39 MPa3.39 MPa
10In situMénard pressuremeter — EM, VlNF P 94-110-1 § D.2.2EM 8.80 MPa ; Vl 914.84 cm³8.80 MPa ; 914.84 cm³
11In situMénard pressuremeter — pl by the inverse curveNF P 94-110-1 annex D2.006 MPa2.006 MPa
12In situCPT — qc, fsNF EN ISO 22476-12.10 MPa ; 50.0 kPa ; 2.38 %2.100 MPa ; 50.000 kPa ; 2.381 %
13FoundationsBearing capacity, laboratory (DTU 13.12)DTU 13.12 § 3.2.1626.6 kPa626.6 kPa
14FoundationsBearing capacity, pressuremeter (DTU 13.12)DTU 13.12 § 3.2.2928.3 kPa928.3 kPa
15FoundationsBearing capacity, CPT (DTU 13.12)DTU 13.12 § 3.2.3.1670.6 kPa670.6 kPa
16FoundationsSPT — Meyerhof (1956)q = 12·N·Kd (B ≤ 1.2 m)239.1 kPa239.1 kPa
17SettlementMénard pressuremeter settlementNF P 94-261 annex Hsc 0.40 ; sd 0.85 cm0.40 ; 0.85 cm
18SettlementOedometric (3 layers) and elastic settlements = Σ H·Cc/(1 + e0)·log((σ'v0 + Δσ)/σ'v0) (NC)48.5 cm ; 1.28 cm48.5 cm ; 1.28 cm
19ConcreteCompressionNF EN 12390-326.2 ; 31.9 MPa26.2 ; 31.9 MPa
20ConcreteUltrasonic pulse velocityNF EN 12504-44 161 m/s4 161 m/s
21ConcreteRebound hammerNF EN 12504-2 § 832 ; 31.3332 ; 31.33
22ConcreteSonReb — Meynink et al. (1979) correlationFormule de CiviLab34.5 MPa34.5 MPa
23ConcreteDreux-GorisseYA = 50 − √D + K + Ks + KpYA 46.13 % ; water 184.2 L46.13 % ; 184.2 L
24ConcreteBolomeyP(d) = A + (100 − A)·√(d/D)P(0.08) 15.1 % ; water 189.8 L15.1 % ; 189.8 L
25ConcreteFauryy(D/2) = A + 17.8·D^(1/5) + B/(R/(1.25·D) − 0.75)60.87 % ; 154.5 L60.87 % ; 154.5 L
26Roads and asphaltKumagawa, paraffin bulk density, degree of compactionTL ext = 100·(M1 − M2)/M25.63 % ; 2.341 ; 96.6 %5.63 % ; 2.341 ; 96.6 %

Limits

  • slope stability: tension cracks, reinforcement (nails, geosynthetics, piles), pore pressures other than hydrostatic (ru) and dynamic analysis are not covered by CiviLab 7.1;
  • foundations: CiviLab applies the Nγ of DTU 13.12; the difference with FHWA example 8-1 (Vesic Nγ) comes from this factor only;
  • SonReb: CiviLab applies the published correlations as they are; their range of validity is that of each publication.

Documents

Choose CiviLab 2027

Get the most attractive subscription price, with free access to all our latest updates.